Course Rules

Please note that if any of these rules is worded differently in your syllabus, that version takes precedence over this general version on my web site (which offers general policies for all of my courses, but some courses or semesters may have more specific needs).

Grading Policies

More detail on my grading policies is provided in the Course Rules section of this page, which is also included in all of my syllabi.

Grading Scale and Explanation

UNT does not use plus/minus grading, so there are only five possible grades for somebody who has completed a course. I always grade on a straight scale, with no rounding, as follows:

Grades are recorded in my grade book as percentages, reflecting the overall quality and depth of the student's knowledge and understanding of the assigned material. The actual point totals of any given assignment do not matter; a grade of 9 points out of 10 works out to be identical to 18 out of 20, 27 out of 30, 45 out of 50, or 90 out of 100, as each of these comes out as .900 or 90.0 percent. The following discussion is meant to offer general guidelines for the differences between different grade levels:

A Range (90.0-100): Excellent

An "A" grade reflects superior knowledge and understanding of the material in question. To receive this grade you must go beyond simply repeating material covered in lecture; there is usually quite a difference between "repetition" and "understanding." It must be noted that grades of 100 percent are very rare, and reflect perfection -- that is, such an answer could not be improved in any way; there are no factual errors in the answer, nothing important has been left out, and the student has done an incredible job of demonstrating an understanding of the material and its relationship to other important concepts or theories. A grade of 90, 93, or 95 percent is still a full "A" and reflects superior understanding above and beyond the repetition of lecture notes or readings. It is also worth noting that UNT does not award "A+" grades, so there is no practical difference between a final course grade of 90.0 and 100.0 percent.

B Range (80.0-89.9): Good

A "B" grade reflects work that is good and above average, but that is not good enough to reach the "A" range. Typical reasons include important omissions in the answer (leaving out concepts or ideas that really need to be there) or factual errors, perhaps from following the "shotgun approach" (write down everything you think you know about the subject, in the hope that the instructor will find what he/she is looking for). Remember, even if your answer includes the correct material the instructor is looking for, also including incorrect or inappropriate material indicates that you do not understand the material at the "A" level.

C Range (70.0-79.9): Average

A "C" grade reflects work that is average at best. Such a grade typically indicates a paper or exam answer that reflects a basic understanding of many of the concepts involved in the assignment, but does not address or integrate these concepts in a very satisfactory manner. "C" answers often contain important errors of fact and/or important omissions from the answer, and are generally not very well organized or written.

D Range (60.0-69.9): Below Average

A "D" grade reflects work that is below average. In the eyes of UNT, such a grade reflects performance that is not worthy of credit toward graduation with a political science degree. Such an answer does not demonstrate the student's understanding of the assigned material, and often reflects a very poorly organized and written argument. In addition to common errors of fact and frequent omissions of relevant material, such an answer rarely reflects much independent thought by the student beyond simply trying to repeat (often incorrectly) material from the lecture or readings.

F (below 60.0): Unacceptable

An "F" grade reflects work that is completely unacceptable. Such work usually shows little resemblance to the assignment, whether because the student left out large parts of the assignment, didn't bother to complete the assignment (preferring some other assignment without the professor's knowledge), or acquired the paper from some other source that was written for a different assignment.

Do I grade on spelling, grammar, organization, etc.?

No, I don't actually deduct a set number of points for each typo, misspelled word, or improperly organized sentence in your paper (although this is something that I have strongly considered doing in the past). On the other hand, a paper that is full of such mistakes is not likely to be effective at any level -- whether in an upper-division undergraduate course at UNT, in law/graduate/business school, or in a report or proposal for your eventual job after graduation. As a result, I will not go out of my way to try to figure out what a student is trying to say if it is not obvious, any more than will a professor in law school when evaluating your work or the CEO of your company when evaluating your reports. If poor writing or organization make it difficult for the reader (in this case me) to follow your line of argument in a paper, you should never expect a professor or supervisor to struggle through your work and try to figure it out, and you should expect to receive a lower grade than a better-organized paper would receive.

Do I award Incomplete (I) grades?

I almost never award I grades, except in the most unusual and well-documented circumstances. Such grades generally involve the awarding of an unfair advantage to a student, as all of his or her classmates were able to attend all examinations and turn in all assigned coursework on time. Remember, any student could do a better job with an additional month or semester to write the paper or study for an exam, so I am very careful about allowing one student an opportunity that all of his or her classmates have not had.

Policy on Letters of Recommendation

I am always willing to write letters of recommendation for students who have taken my classes. Before asking me to write you a letter, though, I should warn you that my letters are always honest and will reflect your actual performance in my course(s) -- including written work, comprehension of the material, and participation in class discussion. In other words, an "A" student who attended class regularly, participated actively in class discussion, read and understood all of the course material, and demonstrated this understanding in his or her written work and class discussion will receive a letter that reflects these accomplishments. Conversely, students who skipped class regularly, did not participate in class discussion, rarely read the material, or wrote poorly will receive letters that reflect these shortcomings. (I should also emphasize that I will cover each of these topics in writing your letter. Before you ask me to overlook one of these areas, you should realize that -- even if I agreed to your request, which I won't -- most grad schools or law schools will notice the omission, and will very likely interpret it as indicating poor performance in that area.)

If you are still interested in receiving a letter of recommendation for me after reading the above paragraph, I will need several items before I can write a good letter.

These items allow me to write a more detailed letter with specific examples, which will be much more useful to a potential grad school or law school admissions office than an impersonal form letter. Similarly, I can write a more accurate and more detailed letter if you sit down and talk with me about what you plan to do (e.g., why you are planning to go to law school, which grad schools interest you and why, or what part of your background gives you a special edge for this career path).

Policy on Directed Research and Capstone Courses

Many students approach me to inquire about directed research courses, such as directed independent studies (DIS) courses or the research project version of UNT's capstone requirement for graduation. I have a number of requirements that must be met before I will agree to direct a DIS course for any undergraduate:

Although these requirements may appear to be restrictive, they are vital to ensuring that the DIS experience will be a good one. Similar policies helped me to undertake two very successful DIS-type courses while I was an undergraduate, and -- when these policies have been followed -- have helped produce very successful DIS courses for students of mine. It is also worth noting that every single bad DIS experience that I have seen could have been avoided by following these rules more rigorously.


http://www.paulhensel.org/teaching.html
Last updated: 9 December 2025
This site © Copyright 1996-present, Paul R. Hensel. All rights reserved.
Site Privacy Policy